Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226209 mildew@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mildew@xxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From mildew@xxxxxxxxx 2007-02-25 19:28 EST ------- (!!) MUST: rpmlint output: **** Review message: W: nut prereq-use fileutils W: nut prereq-use /sbin/chkconfig W: nut prereq-use /sbin/service W: nut buildprereq-use gd-devel W: nut buildprereq-use freetype-devel W: nut buildprereq-use netpbm-devel W: nut buildprereq-use libpng-devel W: nut buildprereq-use net-snmp-devel W: nut buildprereq-use elfutils-devel W: nut buildprereq-use libX11-devel W: nut buildprereq-use libXpm-devel W: nut buildprereq-use libjpeg-devel W: nut buildprereq-use fontconfig-devel W: nut buildprereq-use libusb-devel W: nut prereq-use chkconfig W: nut prereq-use /usr/sbin/useradd W: nut macro-in-%changelog configure - Line: 512 - add --with-statepath and --sysconfdir to %configure (thanks Michael) - Should be: %%configure W: nut patch-not-applied Patch3: nut-2.0.1-bad.patch ******************** (!!) MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. **** Review message: - Packages should not use the PreReq and BuildPrereq tags. Use Requires (or Requires(pre),etc.) and BuildRequires instead. ******************** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review