[Bug 226187] Merge Review: nc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: nc


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226187





------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2007-02-24 12:55 EST -------
Unfortunately the source thing is really problematic for me and I suspect many
others; it's pretty much completely antithetical to the goal of Fedora to track
upstream as much as possible.  Currently we have an unreproducible tarball and
17 patches that taken together are larger than the source itself.

I understand that it would be truly difficult to rebase all of these patches, so
I don't really know what should happen here.  Perhaps we need a few volunteers
to work on the problem.  Or perhaps switching to one of the forked upstream
projects would be better, especially if they support ipv6.  But I would be
really uncomfortable about putting my "approved" stamp on this package without
having some public discussion on the issue.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]