Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908089 --- Comment #8 from Antonio Trande <trpost@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Quoting Tom Callaway's mail: >It is safe to treat Mumps as being in the Public Domain. OK for Fedora. >This (Metis) is non-free. Not acceptable for Fedora. So I need to understand if Thomas Moulard wants re-open his review or accept my co-maintenance proposal since I'm not sponsored. Also I have asked info to upstream maintainer about the use of ascend without Metis. I'm waiting for their replies. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7pwUeNPQFN&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review