Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908089 --- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande <trpost@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #5) > I did not actually test it, but it is ipopt is supposed to > work with the solver as an external module; need to check > how it handles it. > > A quick googling shows that mumps and metis are not > in fedora due to uncertainty of licenses: > > mumps (actually, should be doable, the review > submitter just did leave it to anybody else > willing to work on it, and it is already accepted > in debian/ubuntu): > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566750 Sincerely I didn't understand which is the problem with MUMPS. It is public domain (http://mumps.enseeiht.fr/index.php?page=credits) and 'public domain' is accepted by Fedora (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main). As I can also read by Tom's comment: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566750#c10 > metis (another issue, should talk with upstream IMO, > and get a clean statement about it, also check if > available in other distros): > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715314 > This seems to me more complicate but I read: https://projects.coin-or.org/BuildTools/browser/ThirdParty/Metis/trunk/INSTALL.Metis and http://glaros.dtc.umn.edu/gkhome/metis/metis/faq?q=metis/metis/faq#distribute -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=n991ptdtmj&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review