Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908089 --- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande <trpost@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #3) > I have the full list of my coin-or- review requests > at #894610; it is not the full list of coin-or projects > but matches the contents of the "CoinAll" tarball. > > coin-or-Ipopt is one of the few without dependencies, > but I did not add ThirdParty contents. This should > be carefully reviewed, and still, should not bundle > mumps and metis, not without fpc approval; should > check what is already in fedora, and if missing, > make separate review requests. > > I am happily willing to help on whatever I can > to have it packaged in fedora. Hi Paulo. Only difference between 'ipopt' and 'coin-or-Ipopt' is ThirdParty content; but ThirdParty seems necessary to use Ascend (Bug 908088) with Ipopt (http://ascend4.org/IPOPT#Building_IPOPT). > This should be carefully reviewed, and still, should not bundle mumps and >metis, not without fpc approval So should I open a ticket on https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/3 ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ExZHh7pcTs&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review