Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894482 --- Comment #12 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #11) > Hi, > I will pull out all the SCL stuff so this can make it into Fedora. You don't have to remove everything, just remove the lines we referenced, the rest should be OK, since scl macros are not prohibited in Fedora. > I'd like to talk with you offline so we can work with OpenShift upstream on > their rubygem spec files. Definitely. > They need to be able to have the packages be > built by tito, as well as Koji/Brew. What you see is what they found worked > for them. If there is a better, more prefered way, I'm sure they would like > to hear it. > > If we can get the spec file to work with upstream, and still be acceptable > with Fedora standards, that would be great. If not, hopefully we can get > upstreams spec to not be so different that it's painful to convert to Fedora > standards. The spec has to allow to build regular RPM as well as SCL RPM without any change, just by choosing different build root. And this spec definitely fails to do so, since on RHEL, it would always build as SCL RPM. But let's move the discussion into more appropriate palce :) > Expect a new spec/srpm soon. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=weTrCUUGKE&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review