[Bug 901872] Review Request: python-gd - Python GD module

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901872

--- Comment #5 from Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> ---
I had packaged it for Mandriva some years ago and
forgot about it.
I just sent an email to the current maintainer
asking for information.
BTW, verbatim Debian copyright file is:
---%<---
This work was packaged for Debian by:
    Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@xxxxxxxxxx> on Sunday, Feb. 10, 2002

It was downloaded from http://newcenturycomputers.net/projects/gdmodule.html

Upstream Author:

    Jones <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Copyright:

    Copyright (c) 1995 Richard Jones

License:

    Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
    modification, are permitted under the terms of the BSD License.

    THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
    ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
    IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
    ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
    FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
    DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
    OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
    HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
    LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
    OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
    SUCH DAMAGE.

On Debian systems, the complete text of the BSD License can be
found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/BSD'.

The Debian packaging is:

    Copyright (C) 2009 Julián Moreno Patiño <darkjunix@xxxxxxxxx>
    Copyright (C) 2002 Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@xxxxxxxxxx>

# Please chose a license for your packaging work. If the program you package
# uses a mainstream license, using the same license is the safest choice.
# Please avoid to pick license terms that are more restrictive than the
# packaged work, as it may make Debian's contributions unacceptable upstream.
# If you just want it to be GPL version 3, leave the following lines in.

and is licensed under the GPL version 2, 
see `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2'.
---%<---

I see it is also a good idea to remake the tarball, Debian remakes
it due to the adventure.ttf file in the tarball, not used, but of
unknown license.

README.debian from the debian python-gd package:
---%<---
python-gd for Debian
-------------------

Mantainer: The original source was renamed from gdmodule to python-gd to fit
debian package name on repository. 

Also, the file adventure.ttf was removed for copyright issues and upstream
tarball was repackaged adding +dfsg suffix.

 -- Julián Moreno Patiño <darkjunix@xxxxxxxxx>  Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:31:27
-0500
---%<---

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UcK3QXTfo0&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]