Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206814 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx 2007-02-22 16:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > The modifications in the hugin version of vigra have been submitted upstream and > some of them are already in vigra-1.5.0 (which went into the fedora build system > last night coincidentally). This is definitely not a permanent fork, just some > stuff that isn't yet clean enough to go further upstream. Sounds to me like this is an acceptable path forward in terms of long term development interests nullifying the underlying issue here. Clearly the necessary upstream development communication and interaction is happening as evidenced by the latest vigra release. I think we its perfectly appropriate to let this package in with an internal library statically linking. I'll even volunteer to co-maintain the package and watch the progress of the upstream vigra library development, and help transition the package to using the standard vigra library when its appropriate. Now we need to hear from the currently assigned reviewer. Paul, is this an acceptable special case situation? Or would you like to open this up to a larger discussion on the mailinglists? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review