[Bug 891191] nodejs-fstream-ignore - A thing for ignoring files based on globs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891191

Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(tchollingsworth@g
                   |                            |mail.com)

--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
TODO: Longer Description.

MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces.

$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/nodejs-fstream-ignore-0.0.5-3.fc18.src.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/nodejs-fstream-ignore-0.0.5-3.fc18.noarch.rpm
nodejs-fstream-ignore.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
nodejs-fstream-ignore.noarch: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib/node_modules/fstream-ignore/node_modules/inherits
/usr/lib/node_modules/inherits
nodejs-fstream-ignore.noarch: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib/node_modules/fstream-ignore/node_modules/minimatch
/usr/lib/node_modules/minimatch
nodejs-fstream-ignore.noarch: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib/node_modules/fstream-ignore/node_modules/fstream
/usr/lib/node_modules/fstream
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

Symlinks OK, package requires npm(minimatch), npm(inherits), npm(fstream)

All false positives. OK

MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK
MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines.
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.

$ grep -r MIT .
$ grep -r granted .

FIX: Explain, where does the information come from.

MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc. OK
MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.

$ sha256sum ../SOURCES/fstream-ignore-0.0.5.tgz 
68e284b92d298e39d66085149645fef738b10af19bf96fe95ae74fea9a06c17a 
../SOURCES/fstream-ignore-0.0.5.tgz
$ spectool -g nodejs-fstream-ignore.spec 
Getting http://registry.npmjs.org/fstream-ignore/-/fstream-ignore-0.0.5.tgz to
./fstream-ignore-0.0.5.tgz
$ sha256sum fstream-ignore-0.0.5.tgz 
68e284b92d298e39d66085149645fef738b10af19bf96fe95ae74fea9a06c17a 
fstream-ignore-0.0.5.tgz

OK

MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture. OK
MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK, build
in mock
MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. OK
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK
MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.

$ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/noarch/nodejs-fstream-ignore-0.0.5-3.fc18.noarch.rpm 
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 led 17 07:33
/usr/lib/node_modules/fstream-ignore
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                     7471 bře 27  2012
/usr/lib/node_modules/fstream-ignore/ignore.js
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 led 17 07:33
/usr/lib/node_modules/fstream-ignore/node_modules
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root    root                       29 led 17 07:33
/usr/lib/node_modules/fstream-ignore/node_modules/fstream ->
/usr/lib/node_modules/fstream
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root    root                       30 led 17 07:33
/usr/lib/node_modules/fstream-ignore/node_modules/inherits ->
/usr/lib/node_modules/inherits
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root    root                       31 led 17 07:33
/usr/lib/node_modules/fstream-ignore/node_modules/minimatch ->
/usr/lib/node_modules/minimatch
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                      532 bře 27  2012
/usr/lib/node_modules/fstream-ignore/package.json
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 led 17 07:33
/usr/share/doc/nodejs-fstream-ignore-0.0.5
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                      621 bře 22  2012
/usr/share/doc/nodejs-fstream-ignore-0.0.5/README.md
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 led 17 07:33
/usr/share/doc/nodejs-fstream-ignore-0.0.5/example
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                      351 bře 23  2012
/usr/share/doc/nodejs-fstream-ignore-0.0.5/example/basic.js

OK

MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK
MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK
MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. OK
MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. OK
MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK

SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.

TODO: Query upstream to include LICENSE. Don't forget to redownload the source,
as Isaac seems to not worry about bumping the version number for that.

SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK
SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file
instead of the file itself. OK

TODO: Testy test... don't want to repeat myself.

Package NEEDSWORK: Correct the license thing.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aoQotE6VuC&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]