Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229478 ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2007-02-22 01:16 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM - rpmlint is NOT for RPM. (But following rpmlint warning can be ignored W: qdbm-java devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libjqdbm.so) + source files match upstream. 73f9d2fa4627a321062c4a4de7264946 qdbm-1.8.74.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + .pc files present. + -devel,-cgi,-java,-perl, qdbm++, qdbm++-devel, ruby-qdbm subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review