Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853922 --- Comment #18 from Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #15) > > [!]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even > > when building with ant > > >>>> Pom.xml file is present, but is not installed. Please, install it. > > Done, I put only the pom.xml file as %add_maven_depmap throws an error. Depmap should be installed too. If you get an error message (or exception trace) then feel free to join our IRC channel (#fedora-java on freenode), we should be able to help. > > [!]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink) > > >>>> Line 96 should not copy the apidocs folder, but its contents: > > >>>> cp -rp target/site/apidocs/* %{buildroot}%{javadocdir}/%{name}/ > > >>>> Currently there is the unnecessary directory apidocs in the path. > > Corrected, but the Packaging Guidelines at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#maven_3 > suggest to copy directly the directory: > > mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadocdir}/%{name} > cp -rp [javadoc directory] $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadocdir}/%{name} This is a "bug" in the guidelines :) It should be [javadoc files] or [javadoc directory]/* (In reply to comment #16) > guacamole.src: W: invalid-license AGPLv3+ > > I do not understand this, is it an rpmlint bug? The license is listed as > valid in the package guidelines, fedora-review marks it ok and rpmlint does > not. New licenses are added frequently so there is a delay between licensing page, so obviously rpmlint can't always contain the up-to-date list of license. That's especially true if you are using older (stable) releases instead of Rawhide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Fdgt00JSR9&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review