Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883472 --- Comment #11 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda <bkabrda@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > I'd say that having lnst package with the files from common and proper > > documentation saying what's needed would suffice here. The problem with > > practically useless package will always be there, you just transferred it to > > the subpackage :) > > Does that make sense? > > You're right, you would still be able to install just lnst-common alone. I > just > thought marking it in some way would somehow force people to actually look > into > the documentation and read what they should install :). > > Would it be acceptable to use the base package, but rename it to something > like > lnst-libs or lnst-common? Do you mean renaming the whole package? I don't really think that's wise, as people would think it is a subpackage and search for the main package "lnst". I'd advise using lnst (for what is now lnst-common) and keeping the other two subpackages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Uv7ruQRSrE&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review