[Bug 894338] Review Request: libdistorm - A lightweight, easy-to-use and fast disassembler/decomposer library for x86/AMD64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894338

--- Comment #11 from Ramon de C Valle <rcvalle@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> > Or maybe you're contradicting yourself or not being clear enough.
> 
> Not at all. Eric will be able to explain it to you, because it is his review
> you misunderstood to begin with.
> 
> 
> > "...it doesn't happen for the "silently" updated Spec file anymore
> 
> I've downloaded _two_ src.rpms from this ticket, and the second one still
> was suffering from the same problem. If you continue to publish updates
> silently in an attempt to fix issues reported to you, you need to accept
> that reviewers still refer to older files:
Maybe this is because I'm working with Eric to resolve the issues reported?
Until now you haven't annouced yourself as a reviewer nor as a possible
sponsor, so don't expect notifications or anything made specially for you.

> 
>   $ md5sum libdistorm-3.3-1.fc18.src.rpm 
>   beac57444a21349c4a65c76f0e81cebc  libdistorm-3.3-1.fc18.src.rpm
>   Build Date: Mon 14 Jan 2013 05:26:20 PM CET
> 
> That's why it's common practice to update the Release tag *and* to maintain
> a %changelog section in the spec file.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FrequentlyMadeMistakes
I wouldn't change it or add a changelog entry until the package is ready for
the initial release.

> 
> 
> > Why is it better than:
> > 
> > rm -fr %{_builddir}/distorm3
> > unzip %{SOURCE0}
> > %setup -q -n distorm3/make/linux -D -T
> 
> Nobody claimed anything would be "better". I only pointed out that your
> %prep section didn't work well and suggested a cleaner working one. Your
> latest one still isn't pretty, and the top builddir is still not related to
> %name-%version, but if it works and if you like it so much, nobody would
> object. ;-)
> 
> 
> What's the status of the package here now?
If you are going to review it, the latest version was just "silently" uploaded.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5lpJDWbKuk&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]