Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851812 Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxx | |m Assignee|leigh123linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxx |m |m Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> --- New scratch build (the previous one was outdated): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4852927 $ rpmlint -i -v *compiz-manager.noarch: I: checking compiz-manager.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libcompizconfig You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. compiz-manager.noarch: I: checking-url http://www.compiz.org/ (timeout 10 seconds) compiz-manager.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/compiz-manager-0.6.0/COPYING The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. compiz-manager.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary compiz-manager Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. compiz-manager.src: I: checking compiz-manager.src: I: checking-url http://www.compiz.org/ (timeout 10 seconds) compiz-manager.src: I: checking-url http://releases.compiz.org/0.6.0/compiz-manager-0.6.0.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) compiz-manager.spec: I: checking-url http://releases.compiz.org/0.6.0/compiz-manager-0.6.0.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. No manual page - not your problem. Wrong FSF address - not your problem. But in both cases, you have to inform the upstream developers, if possible, so that they can fix it in future releases. "explicit-lib-dependency libcompizconfig" is no problem in our case. In a noarch package without special build requirements, we don't have specific library calls which could rpm use to generate runtime dependencies. Stay tuned for a full review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZtZElVSkuP&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review