Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891237 Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(tchollingsworth@g | |mail.com) --- Comment #1 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Description and Summary are OK. MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build produces. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/nodejs-slide-1.1.3-3.fc18.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/nodejs-slide-1.1.3-3.fc18.noarch.rpm nodejs-slide.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) slideshow -> sideshow, slide show, slide-show nodejs-slide.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US js -> dis, ks, j nodejs-slide.src: W: no-%build-section nodejs-slide.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) slideshow -> sideshow, slide show, slide-show nodejs-slide.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US js -> dis, ks, j nodejs-slide.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. FIX: Add an empty %build section Other issues are false positive. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. There is no license statement in the tarball. However I can see it on GitHub https://raw.github.com/isaacs/slide-flow-control/master/LICENSE FIX: Add statement about the LICENSE in future release (as you did in nodejs-promzard) MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it is used by the sources file once imported into git. $ sha256sum ../SOURCES/slide-1.1.3.tgz 80c07458031e72640a5cf0abe8825e8c33ef00a0326217ae7c1c59494ee96e04 ../SOURCES/slide-1.1.3.tgz $ wget -q http://registry.npmjs.org/slide/-/slide-1.1.3.tgz $ sha256sum slide-1.1.3.tgz 80c07458031e72640a5cf0abe8825e8c33ef00a0326217ae7c1c59494ee96e04 slide-1.1.3.tgz OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK, builds in mock MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. $ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/noarch/nodejs-slide-1.1.3-3.fc18.noarch.rpm drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 led 9 11:46 /usr/lib/node_modules/slide drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 led 9 11:46 /usr/lib/node_modules/slide/lib -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1729 čec 27 2011 /usr/lib/node_modules/slide/lib/async-map-ordered.js -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1496 čec 27 2011 /usr/lib/node_modules/slide/lib/async-map.js -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 382 čec 27 2011 /usr/lib/node_modules/slide/lib/bind-actor.js -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 660 čec 27 2011 /usr/lib/node_modules/slide/lib/chain.js -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 121 čec 27 2011 /usr/lib/node_modules/slide/lib/slide.js drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 led 9 11:46 /usr/lib/node_modules/slide/node_modules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 520 čec 27 2011 /usr/lib/node_modules/slide/package.json drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 led 9 11:46 /usr/share/doc/nodejs-slide-1.1.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 733 čec 27 2011 /usr/share/doc/nodejs-slide-1.1.3/README.md -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 167502 čec 27 2011 /usr/share/doc/nodejs-slide-1.1.3/nodejs-controlling-flow.pdf OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. OK Please fix the FIX items and consider fixing TODOs. Resolution: NEEDSWORK. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=X7rFcbztgK&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review