[Bug 891223] nodejs-read - read(1) for node programs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891223

Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(tchollingsworth@g
                   |                            |mail.com)

--- Comment #1 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Summary verified from package.json

TODO: Description should rather be at least a sentence. Something like:

"A method for reading user input from stdin in node.js.
Similar to the readline builtin's question() method,
but with a few more features."

MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.

nodejs-read.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C read(1) for node programs
nodejs-read.src: W: no-%build-section
nodejs-read.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C read(1) for node programs
nodejs-read.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
nodejs-read.noarch: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib/node_modules/read/node_modules/mute-stream
/usr/lib/node_modules/mute-stream
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.

TODO: Consider adding a word (such as Function or Method) at the beginning of
the summary to prevent summary-not-capitalized
FIX: Add %build section (even if empty), it is needed (some tools might want to
add something at the beginning or at the end of it)
Symblink OK (package requires npm(mute-stream))

MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK
MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK

MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.

License chcecked in LICENSE file: BSD. OK

MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc. OK
MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it is
used by the sources file once imported into git.

$ sha256sum ../SOURCES/read-1.0.4.tgz
8be269afeaa7cc62feb4672e8e61e5133152266dc5347b23cf5b05bc40789601 
../SOURCES/read-1.0.4.tgz
$ wget -q http://registry.npmjs.org/read/-/read-1.0.4.tgz
$ sha256sum read-1.0.4.tgz
8be269afeaa7cc62feb4672e8e61e5133152266dc5347b23cf5b05bc40789601 
read-1.0.4.tgz

OK

MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture. OK
MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK, builds
in mock
MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. OK
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create
a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create
that directory. OK
MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.

$ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/noarch/nodejs-read-1.0.4-1.fc18.noarch.rpm 
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 led  7 20:05
/usr/lib/node_modules/read
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 led  7 20:05
/usr/lib/node_modules/read/lib
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                     2414 srp 17 02:22
/usr/lib/node_modules/read/lib/read.js
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 led  7 20:05
/usr/lib/node_modules/read/node_modules
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root    root                       33 led  7 20:05
/usr/lib/node_modules/read/node_modules/mute-stream ->
/usr/lib/node_modules/mute-stream
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                      473 srp 17 02:26
/usr/lib/node_modules/read/package.json
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 led  7 20:05
/usr/share/doc/nodejs-read-1.0.4
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                     1318 bře 17  2012
/usr/share/doc/nodejs-read-1.0.4/LICENCE
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                     1721 srp 17 02:26
/usr/share/doc/nodejs-read-1.0.4/README.md
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 led  7 20:05
/usr/share/doc/nodejs-read-1.0.4/example
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                      520 čec 24 09:44
/usr/share/doc/nodejs-read-1.0.4/example/example.js

MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK
MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK
MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. OK
MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. OK
MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK

SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK
SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file
instead of the file itself. OK

Other hints:

TODO: Consider dropping %defattr(-,root,root,-) in %files, it is not needed.
TODO: Remove the BuildRoot variable, it is not needed either.

Please fix the FIX items and consider fixing TODOs.

Resolution: NEEDSWORK.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vzV1UZL7ER&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]