Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcdaudio - Control operation of a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220890 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-20 19:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > It seems there has been a lack of communication between FPC and FESCo. At the > very least, some members of FESCo appear to be unaware of any changes made to > the packaging guidelines... Well, fesco and fpc overlap by > 50% or more, so at least that amount of fesco should be aware of fpc topics automatically and have perfect communication. :) (In reply to comment #13) > its mandatory use it regardless of your personal beliefs the community that > you are part of agreed to it. if it changes at some point in the future Ahem, the "future" was a week ago. FPC reevaluated this decision and dropped that buildroot in favour of the mktemp one, the voting was unanimously. But I don't know whether it was persented to fesco on Thursday and if, whether it was ratified. > you will be free to change it then. until then please abide by the > guidelines. Please check fedora-packaging (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #11) > > I'm from FPC. Yes, we went for using mktemp -ud as the lesser evil. The expected > > side-effects are that stepped rpmbuilds (using --short-circuit for example) > > won't work anymore unless you supply a buildroot on the command line. > > Could you post a reproducer for this to fedora-packaging? -bi --short-circuit > builds work just fine for me with a mktemp -ud BuildRoot when it's specified in > a specfile. OTOH it doesn't work for whatever reason if I set it in > ~/.rpmmacros (gets evaluated twice in that case), but perhaps that's what you meant? Sorry, Ville, I think you are 100% correct and this is a Red Herring. I was just quoting racor on this w/o thinking too much on my own. Indeed, since it's not quite sane to use the buildroot outside of %install and %clean, all that is slightly broken is separating building and cleaning, but IMHO we can live with that. Of course you will find some people that claim that %buildroot should be available during %build, too, and I remember such a discussion on fedora-packaging, perhaps racor was even one of them. We should better create a guideline against using %buildroot in %prep and %build. :) So even less evil with the mktemp variant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review