Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sear-media - media files for the sear game client Alias: sear-media https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227873 ------- Additional Comments From wart@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-20 17:16 EST ------- Updated package: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/sear.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/sear-media-0.6-2.src.rpm - editor swap file removed - I've asked upstream to clarify/cleanup the licensing text, and updated the spec file to use "License: GPL/GFDL" - Removed duplicate license texts from %doc and %{_datadir} I'm not sure of the best way to handle the unowned /usr/share/sear directory. This is provided by the 'sear' package, which will 'Requires: sear-media' once approved. But this would still allow someone to install sear-media without sear, and have an unowned directory. I see two ways to handle this: 1) Have both sear and sear-media own %{_datadir}/sear 2) Have both packages require each other: sear 'Requires: sear-media' sear-media 'Requires: sear' ...but I thought that circular dependencies were frowned upon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review