Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iasl - Intel acpi compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226704 ------- Additional Comments From opensource@xxxxxxxxx 2007-02-20 13:40 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/iasl.spec SRPM URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/repo/iasl-20061109-2.src.rpm (In reply to comment #3) > rpmlint: > E: iasl description-line-too-long iasl compiles ASL (ACPI Source Language) into > AML (ACPI Machine Language), which > - reformat to use less than 70 chars, I guess Fixed, has to be less that 80 chars, it was excactly 80 chars. > W: iasl invalid-license Intel Software License Agreement See the comment in the spec file: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2007-January/msg00427.html > W: iasl spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/iasl.1.gz > - chmod 0644 fixed > I would also package the other utilities if possible. Do you want to do it or do you use the utitilities? I am not very keen to package them unless they are very needed. If you want to maintain iasl, you can have it. Actually I only wanted to include it to Extras because it is needed by virtualbox, but since I found out that virtualbox needs at least 2 more packages in fedora it exceeds the amount of work that I have free for this. So if you do not need iasl or the other contents of the tarball or want to maintain it, I will close this ticket, soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review