Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: caps - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190045 ------- Additional Comments From gemi@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-20 12:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > So should ladspa own /usr/lib/ladspa, ladspa does own /usr/lib/ladspa > /usr/share/ladspa this should also be owned ladspa > and liblrdf own > /usr/share/ladspa/rdf? No, also to the ladspa package Maybe file a bug against ladspa, with a reference to this bug. > This package could require those packages. The only > weird thing is that apart from these directories, there are no other runtime > dependencies on those things. I think it is not reasonable for ladspa-caps-plugins to require ladspa. True, it doesn't really depend on it, but gives a certain consistency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review