[Bug 823340] Review Request: rubygem-ipaddress - rubygem abstraction for ipv4, ipv6 addresses

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823340

--- Comment #2 from Julian C. Dunn <jdunn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Hi Michael,

Jonas seems to have abandoned his packages that are pre-requisites for Chef, so
I am taking them over.

(In reply to comment #1)

> - Gem package should exclude cached Gem. However, It seems to have
> disappeared from the ruby guidelines, but that's still present in the talk
> page :
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_talk:Ruby
> 
> So i am not sure exactly on what to do. Could you reach ruby-sig and check ?
> ( from what I have seen and read, there is more people who would prefer to
> have them removed than kept, since there isn't much reason to keep the cache
> but I didn't look much )
>
> Except that, the package should be good.

I generally exclude the cached Gems from the package. That seems to be the
general consensus from others on ruby-sig who have reviewed my packages. So if
there are no other objections please set fedora-review+ & I'll import this
as-is with an additional %exclude for it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kJ9oSE7Tra&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]