Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sysklogd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226448 jpo@xxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpo@xxxxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From jpo@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-20 11:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > fixed in sysklogd-1.4.1-47.fc7 > 3) I think "no". I didn't find many "Require: logrotate" in spec files of > packages, which rotate its files. In the syslog-ng.spec there is a requirement for logrotate: syslog-ng installs a file in the /etc/logrotate.d directory which is owned by the logrotate package. $ rpm -qf /etc/logrotate.d/ logrotate-3.7.4-12.fc6 > 4e) I have renamed logrotate.d/syslog but not going to do the same for > init.t/syslog. I'm worry it could make more problems. The rename broke the usage of syslog-ng as a sysklogd replacement. Syslog-ng needs to ship the same file as sysklogd (same MD5 digest to avoid file conflicts): logrotate doesn't like that two different configuration scripts rotate the same log files. jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review