Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222374 ------- Additional Comments From eric.moret@xxxxxxxx 2007-02-20 00:29 EST ------- The whole process has been a bit confusing to me as well! I initially inquired for a sponsorship for the paprefs package but was instead granted it for alsa- plugins (Bug #222248). However I am not the assignee on that specific bug, so I can't do much with it. Anyways, it was my intend to respect the workflow and wait until I get this package reviewed before submitting it in CVS. Do you think you could spare a few cycles in a review of the paprefs package? If not I can just remove that CVS admin request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review