Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886903 --- Comment #1 from Erik Schilling <ablu.erikschilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- It looks to me like the specfile uses nexuiz as binary name? Shouldn't Xonotic be used there? Also I am not sure whether xonotic should really obsolote nexuiz. Of course nexuiz upstream is dead and simply removing nexuiz's darkplaces might make packaging easier. But xonotic does NOT offer compatibility to nexuiz servers. People who still play Nexuiz would be force updated to Xonotic and cannot play on their favourite servers anymore. Regards Erik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OFFmJeBpNE&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review