Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871092 --- Comment #27 from Antonio Trande <trpost@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- source(In reply to comment #24) > (In reply to comment #21) > > The longer version is: This package review has developed into a wrong > > direction. Even if there are "two new packager candidates", there are also > > "two sponsors", who should try to be more helpful. > > (e.g. to > increase the release with every new package). I'm sorry. I'll do that. > > I think the main problem is the software that is packaged here. IHMO it's > not anywhere near inclusion in Fedora: It violates the FHS (at least at the > beginning it was), hardcodes paths and has no proper build system. Not > necessarily the easiest thing to package, especially for new contributors. If you refer to the language hardcodes paths, the patch could be a solution. Or no ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=muYOrpJB36&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review