Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-19 11:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #42) > Bernard, now gdome2 maintainer is you. I just submitted a build of gdome2 for devel, so it will probably appear tomorrow, unless you are using the buildsys repo. Also, here is later build of ntop. Starting with the rc0 of ntop, it would not build for me. There were big updates to the autotools configurations. I didn't understand why it wasn't building so I did a bi-section of the changes. Now I have a patch that will make it build, but honestly, I'm not sure why it works. If you wouldn't mind, take a look at shrext.patch. If I don't apply this small patch on my system to reverse part of the changes, the build will fail on my system. Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/ntop.spec SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/ntop-3.3-0.1.20060218cvs.fc6.src.rpm * Wed Feb 18 2007 Bernard Johnson <bjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> - 3.3-0.1.20060218cvs - update to ntop cvs 20060208 * Wed Feb 07 2007 Bernard Johnson <bjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> - 3.3-0.1.20060207cvs - update to ntop cvs 20060207 - remove gdbm, pidfile, and FEDORAextra patches - ntopdump.dtd has fixed eol markers now - update nolibs patch so there is no complaint about xmldump libraries/headers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review