[Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: zlib


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226671


varekova@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |varekova@xxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From varekova@xxxxxxxxxx  2007-02-19 07:18 EST -------

(In reply to comment #1)
Thanks for your comment.

> * the source is not one of those appearing on the home page. Moreover
>   you could use the tar.bz2.
fixed source tag

> * Is Prefix: %{_prefix} needed?
I prefer to leave prefix flag set there.

 
> * BuildRoot is not the preferred one
changed
 
> * The comment in %build is misleading. It should better be something like
> # prepare Makefile for the static lib
changed
 
> and in %install there could be a comment saying
> # the first make triggers compilation of the object files, linking of the
> # shared library and installs the library
> # The second make triggers the linking of the static library and 
> # its installation
this comment is not necessary 
 
> * I think it would be better to have, in -devel
> http://www.zlib.net/manual.html
> and
> http://www.zlib.net/zlib_how.html
These documents are not part of upstream tarball

> * it seems to me that FAQ should be in %doc, and ChangeLog should be
> in the main package
changed and added 
 
> * -devel should 
> Requires: zlib = %{version}-%{release}
changed
 
> * It seems to me that there should be a make clean between the 2
> make -f invocations, to trigger recompilation with the flags without -fPIC
> * I'll attach a patch to simplify the build and install, and use more
> macros.
fixed
 
> * zutil.h seems to be an internal header that should no be shipped
removed
 
> * seems like that spec is not in utf8, certainly because of Glomsrød
fixed
 
> * remove the dots at the end of the Summaries
fixed
 
> Change %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-,root,root,-)
changed

Fixed version is zlib-1.2.3-5.fc7

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]