Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts - Tibetan Machine Uni font for Tibetan, Dzongkha and Ladakhi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218342 ------- Additional Comments From petersen@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-18 23:50 EST ------- Thanks for your detailed answers. (In reply to comment #11) > When you look at description in spec file and > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibetan_script you will see that using this fonts > you can write in Tibetan, Dzongkha and Ladakhi. Yes, but looking at the above page and other places it seems common practice to call the script "Tibetan" and so it still seems reasonable to me to call the package fonts-tibetan. > Then my propose is to pack TMU and > Jomolhari together and name it fonts-tibetan-dzongkha(-ladakhi)? fonts-tibetan-dzongkha(-ladakhi) seems too long. Most references to the script(s) seem to call it Tibetan, so my feeling as an outsider is that it is ok to just call it fonts-tibetan, but if there is strong evidence to the contrary we should look at that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review