Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881431 --- Comment #8 from Eduardo Echeverria <echevemaster@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #7) > Hi Eduardo. > > His source rpm is for Fedora 16. If it was for EPEL5, then it should be > packaged as el5 ... > This leads me to think to Fedora packaging rules. :) Hi Antonio, not necessarily, remember that if you don't have a specific release of fedora to build, not mean you can not offer the package for different branches, mock or koji, takes care of that. look in /etc/mock the available configurations, You'll get output like this: echevemaster@echevemaster mock$ ls default.cfg fedora-17-i386.cfg fedora-5-x86_64-epel.cfg epel-5-i386.cfg fedora-17-ppc64.cfg fedora-devel-i386.cfg epel-5-ppc.cfg fedora-17-ppc.cfg fedora-devel-ppc64.cfg epel-5-x86_64.cfg fedora-17-s390.cfg fedora-devel-ppc.cfg epel-6-i386.cfg fedora-17-s390x.cfg fedora-devel-x86_64.cfg epel-6-ppc64.cfg fedora-17-sparc64.cfg fedora-rawhide-arm.cfg epel-6-x86_64.cfg fedora-17-sparc.cfg fedora-rawhide-armhfp.cfg fedora-16-arm.cfg fedora-17-x86_64.cfg fedora-rawhide-i386.cfg fedora-16-i386.cfg fedora-18-arm.cfg fedora-rawhide-ppc64.cfg fedora-16-ppc64.cfg fedora-18-armhfp.cfg fedora-rawhide-ppc.cfg fedora-16-ppc.cfg fedora-18-i386.cfg fedora-rawhide-s390.cfg fedora-16-s390.cfg fedora-18-ppc64.cfg fedora-rawhide-s390x.cfg fedora-16-s390x.cfg fedora-18-ppc.cfg fedora-rawhide-sparc64.cfg fedora-16-sparc64.cfg fedora-18-s390.cfg fedora-rawhide-sparc.cfg fedora-16-sparc.cfg fedora-18-s390x.cfg fedora-rawhide-x86_64.cfg fedora-16-x86_64.cfg fedora-18-x86_64.cfg logging.ini fedora-17-arm.cfg fedora-5-i386-epel.cfg site-defaults.cfg fedora-17-armhfp.cfg fedora-5-ppc-epel.cfg or just do a scratch build koji build --scratch dist-5E-epel foo.rpm Moreover, how recognize that probably a packager wants to offer its package on EPEL5 ? - Buildroot is present BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is present at the beginning of %install - %clean section is present Although it is always good to ask what are intentions of packager. François I'm sorry for the flood, But I thought it necessary to explain this to Antonio -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review