Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884 bjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776, 177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-18 06:00 EST ------- It appears that this bug was /somewhat/ fixed, but perhaps not in the way I expected. http://projects.sucs.org/projects/pybackpack/ticket/36 It *is* much faster now, but when I exclude a directory like ~/xbuild, it still walks the tree, even if I excluded that directory from the backup set. Why? What use is that if we are not going to backup those files? Also, if there are any unreadable files/directories, the backup will terminate. It should just continue, but with a warning that those files could not be backed up. Sun Feb 18 03:34:44 2007: Starting backup of 'home-terastation' to '/net/terastation/mnt/array1/backup/pybackpack' Sun Feb 18 03:34:44 2007: Analysing backup source Sun Feb 18 03:38:48 2007: Permissions/file missing problems on certain files: Directory: /home/bjohnson/.lightscribe Sun Feb 18 03:38:48 2007: Backup failed. Setting your FE-NEEDSPONSOR and FE-NEW blockers so the right people can find you ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review