Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkpod - Graphical song management program for Apple's iPod Alias: gtkpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228425 ------- Additional Comments From tmz@xxxxxxxxx 2007-02-17 23:29 EST ------- Xavier, would you please show me where this is required or recommended? Just saying I need to do something isn't very good in my opinion. I want to know why it should be changed so that I understand it for next time. This will also help others reading the review to learn why one path is better than another. Better than that, if I understand why it's better in one place than the other I can most likely get it installed there upstream so I don't have to worry about doing it in the specfile. A quick grep of the specfiles in extras-development shows me there are 63 specs that install something to %{_datadir}/pixmaps and 39 installing to %{_datadir}/icons. It seems to me that unless there is a requirement to use one or the other, that this is just a matter of preference and it should not be a blocker. If you know differently or have good reason why I should install under %{_datadir}/icons, please enlighten me. I am always insterested in learning. No matter where it ends up going, since the file is one that's included with the upstream tarball and is already installed in %{_datadir}/%{name}/pixmaps, I don't see why a symlink isn't better than a copy of the file. Please explain why a symlink isn't any good to you. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review