Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dhcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225691 ------- Additional Comments From dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-17 18:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > Would something else be better in the License: field than 'distributible'? > > I guess that Distributable should shut rpmlint up. But it may be better > to have a rpmlint warning than a meaningless license. So maybe 'ISC', > or 'ISC License' could be right if it is something known. The common name is the ISC license, but that doesn't appear on www.opensource.org. The info is here: http://www.isc.org/index.pl?/sw/dhcp/dhcp-copyright.php I would vote for saying 'ISC' as the license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review