Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869915 --- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> --- $ rpmlint -i -v * harmonyseq.src: I: checking harmonyseq.src: I: checking-url http://harmonyseq.wordpress.com/ (timeout 10 seconds) harmonyseq.src: I: checking-url http://launchpad.net/harmonyseq/stable/0.16/+download/harmonySEQ-0.16.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) harmonyseq.i686: I: checking harmonyseq.i686: I: checking-url http://harmonyseq.wordpress.com/ (timeout 10 seconds) harmonyseq.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary harmonySEQ Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. harmonyseq.x86_64: I: checking harmonyseq.x86_64: I: checking-url http://harmonyseq.wordpress.com/ (timeout 10 seconds) harmonyseq.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary harmonySEQ Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. harmonyseq-debuginfo.i686: I: checking harmonyseq-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://harmonyseq.wordpress.com/ (timeout 10 seconds) harmonyseq-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking harmonyseq-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://harmonyseq.wordpress.com/ (timeout 10 seconds) harmonyseq.spec: I: checking-url http://launchpad.net/harmonyseq/stable/0.16/+download/harmonySEQ-0.16.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Some warnings about missing man pages, no matter. The file headers in /src contain the "newer versions" clause, that's why the license is "GPLv3+". Fix this, and your package is ready for a full review. I haven't found any other issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review