Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409 --- Comment #20 from Michal Ingeli <mi@xxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #18) > I've stopped working on this, the repo was created, however, I wait for this > discusion to end somehow, before I continue. Until Mario (or anyone else) raises any objection or blocker, you are free to continue and submit builds. (In reply to comment #19) > The only thing which I would show is that I don't recognize this as the > right way to review packages. We have the review guidelines, and we should > follow them. This is not about the quality of your package, it was just > about the quality of the review. Of course, we can change everything once > the packages have been built and some bugs come up. But we could perhaps > avoid this by doing reviews according to the guidelines. There is no guideline, that requires use of fedora-review(1). As sponsor, you should know that. If you found that any of (and even 'SHOULD') guidelines were violated, please, state it here, so we can fix it. While doing review-review, if there are any parts of review, that are not clear to you, I will happily explain them. Community projects are about cooperation and communication, not only guidelines, even if there is no guideline for that. If this should go more OT, please contact me (cc my sponsor) via mail. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review