[Bug 851180] Review Request: mingw-lcms - MinGW Color Management System

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851180

Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > 4) Lines beginning with 'Group:' are superfluous and can be removed
> I can do this if you really absolutely require this, but I find it ugly when
> rpm -qi reports "Group: Unspecified"; also, other mingw packages also
> provide a group name

The packaging guidelines say that it's only needed for EPEL compatibility:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Group_tag

There's been some talk about doing a small revision of the MinGW packaging
guidelines and, among other things, get rid of the group tag in the example
spec file. So far it's just a draft though.

I don't think it's overly important to drop this tag, definitely not a review
blocker.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]