Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Archive-Tar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226239 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-16 11:16 EST ------- > the license is included in the POD for this package: This is standared for most CPAN dist. > 'GPL or Artistic' is standard for most CPAN modules. This is the shortcut we once had agreed upon to use, when a perl-module's copyright carries license notice of this kind: "This library is free software; you may redistribute and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself." So licensing-wise this package seems OK. Wrt. to license files we once also had agreed upon NOT to require detached license files, unless the package contains one. i.e. if a perl-module contains one you MUST add it to %doc, if not you don't have to add one. So. both rpmlint complains are void. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review