Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875299 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for your informal review. (In reply to comment #2) > - In %setup you can use '%setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}' Well, there is no benefit from using '-n %{name}-%{version}' in this case because '-n %{name}-%{version}' is the default. > - According to Licensing Guide Lines [1], if the source package includes the > text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text > of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. If the source > package does not include the text of the license(s), the packager should > contact upstream and encourage them to correct this mistake. > License seems indicated on slowstats.cc file. http://code.google.com/p/slowhttptest/issues/detail?id=16&thanks=16&ts=1353075779 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review