Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts - Tibetan Machine Uni font for Tibetan, Dzongkha and Ladakhi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218342 petersen@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From petersen@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-15 19:22 EST ------- Sorry, apologies, I incorrectly marked this review needsponsor, but I see you already own a number of packages in Extras. :-) (In reply to comment #6) > In FE I have found: charis-fonts, gentium-fonts, artwiz-aleczapka-fonts and > many others, instead there are only 3 fonts-* packages so I thought naming this > package tibetan-machine-uni-fonts would be ok, but of course I could rename it. Point. Hmm, unfortunately we don't seem to have clear policy on naming fonts packages. In Core currently most core fonts are now named "fonts-<lang>". I'm not familiar with most of the fonts in Extras, but some of them look like more miscellaneous fonts, etc. So I can see both points of view. So my take is, if this is the standard free font for Tibetan then we should probably name it fonts-tibetan, otherwise we can keep the current name. > I also have next problem, it's called ;) Jomolhari Font > (http://www.thdl.org/tools/fonts/tibfonts.php?l=uva200607171100) which I would > also want to put it in FE, but I don't known should I include this font in > fonts-tibetan (beside that fonts could display not only Tibetan but also > Dzongkha and Ladakhi) package? Right both fonts seem to cover more than one language, but maybe it is ok. If the main use of this is also for Tibetan I think it is fine to include in fonts-tibetan if it is also useful for general users of Tibetan. Both fonts are under GPL so that is ok anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review