https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821917 --- Comment #10 from Jos de Kloe <josdekloe@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for updating. rpmbuild and mock results look fine again, and rpmlint outputs are identical to your 0.9.902 version. Looking at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs (section 1.4 package contents), the "Why package the source elisp?" note says that the main purpose of the elisp package is to get help on variables and provide debugging information on the *.elc files. Therefore the emacs-mu4e-el is only useful for this purpose when emacs-mu4e is installed as well, so adding the directory ownership to emacs-mu4e is fine I think. Thinking about this, I think emacs-mu4e-el should explicitely require emacs-mu4e. I inspected randomly two other packages that package emacs extensions and they do this as well (looked at mercurial and gnuplot). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review