https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865970 --- Comment #2 from Petr Machata <pmachata@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #1) > it seems there is code from elfutils bundled with it, and while I can see > the reason, I think this should be agreed by the FPC, could you see with > them ? Thanks for review. I went through the files, and the only actual copy from elfutils is eu-config.h. This was only used for likely() and unlikely() predicates, and I can live without those, so I dropped eu-config.h. known-dwarf.h is generated, I think I could hook it into a build process eventually to mirror what's in system dwarf.h, but for now it is unused at all, and I just dropped it. The .cc and .hh files comprising dwlocstat itself (and dwarfstrings.c/.h as well) grew up on elfutils "dwarf" branch. But it's very unlikely that this branch will get merged anytime soon (or ever), which is why I split this small tool off to a separate project. I don't think this counts as embedding a copy, this code never was part of upstream elfutils tarball. > ( and add the breakdown of the license ). I did that now. The updated SRPM and SPEC are: http://pmachata.fedorapeople.org/dwlocstat.spec http://pmachata.fedorapeople.org/dwlocstat-0.1-0.2.20121105gitc55cb50.fc15.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review