Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226479 ------- Additional Comments From wart@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-15 15:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > > E: tcl invalid-soname /usr/lib/libtcl8.4.so libtcl8.4.so > It must stay for backward compatibility. > > > Use %{_libdir} instead of %{_prefix}/%{_lib} > Please see if it's everything allright. The use of %{_libdir} looks ok, but the backwards-compatible link is still wrong: cd %{_datadir} ln -s %{name}%{majorver} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/%{name}%{majorver} This creates the same recursive link: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 2007-02-15 11:47 /usr/lib/tcl8.4 -> tcl8.4 I think you want either: ln -s %{_datadir}/%{name}%{majorver} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/%{name}%{majorver} or ln -s %{_datadir}/%{name}%{majorver} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_prefix}/lib/%{name}%{majorver} It's unclear to me from the comment in the spec file if this should be %{_prefix}/lib or %{_libdir} for backwards compatibility. Do you know which other packages need this backwards compatible link? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review