https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871037 --- Comment #5 from Ivan Romanov <drizt@xxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #4) > First, I notice that the configure output shows some things missing that > actually do exist in Fedora. These *could* be added as BuildRequires, > although I recognize you may have reasons for not wishing to do so: > libguess-devel, db4-devel, libtranslate-devel, aspell. I will think about this. Before I need more knowledges about this posibilites. So I built a library with only thats requires which I enough good understand. > Second, there is a compiler warning that probably should not be ignored: > > rccstring.c: In function 'rccStringFixID': > rccstring.c:67:44: warning: array subscript is above array bounds > [-Warray-bound > s] > > This warning points to an off-by-one error. This line: > > memcpy(lang, header->language, 2); lang[3] = 0; > > should really be this: > > memcpy(lang, header->language, 2); lang[2] = 0; Thanks! I will forward this to upstream. > Third, the unused direct shared library dependency warnings from rpmlint can > be eliminated by adding this to the %configure line: > LDFLAGS="-Wl,--as-needed $RPM_LD_FLAGS". Hm... > Fourth, another option for the Source0 download URL is Source0: > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rusxmms/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 (see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.net). (I'm > not saying you have to switch, just that sourceforge is a known quantity > when it comes to downloads.) Sourceforge hasn't librcc-0.2.9.tar.gz so I use dside.dyndns.org. I will request to an author to use sourceforge for all sources. > [!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. In really the author allready known about this and he promised to update librcc on the next week. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review