https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870522 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for the comments, Ivan. (In reply to comment #1) > Drop BR ocaml (ocaml-ocamldoc will pull it when building) It is redundant, true, but I prefer to keep that particular BR since this is an ocaml package, so having an explicit BR on the package that provides the compiler and runtime seems like a good thing to me. > Ise %{?_isa} for devel subpackage > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/ > Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package Good catch. I have fixed this. > static library must be in static subpackage > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/ > Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries Except for the case of OCaml packages. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:OCaml, and the section entitled "-devel subpackage" in particular. New URLs: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/ocaml-zarith/ocaml-zarith.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/ocaml-zarith/ocaml-zarith-1.1-2.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review