[Bug 871604] Review Request: fedup - fedora upgrade tool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871604

Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name. 
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. 
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. 
OK - License (GPLv2+)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
No checksum, but diff of checkout matches unpacked tar.xz

OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. 
OK - Package has a correct %clean section. 
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content. 
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. 
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. 
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. 
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. 
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. 
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
See below - No rpmlint output. 
OK - final provides and requires are sane.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock. 
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin

Issues: 

1. Would be good to include commands needed to checkout source if there's 
not a direct download link: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control
A direct Source0 link would be nice if possible. 

2. rpmlint says: 

fedup.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C the Fedora Upgrade tool

Change the 'to' to 'To' ?

fedup.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fedup-cli

man page would be nice, but of course not required. 

fedup.src:44: W: macro-in-comment %files
fedup.src:45: W: macro-in-comment %{_bindir}
fedup.src:46: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
fedup.src: W: invalid-url Source0: fedup-0.7.tar.xz

Remove % from those commented lines, or use %%

None of those are blockers. If you could address them before import that would 
be great. Otherwise, this package is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]