[Bug 871003] Review Request: obapps - Graphical tool for configuring per-application settings in Openbox

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871003

--- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> avoid 
> %install
> %{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root %{buildroot}
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Byte_compiling

This rule doesn't say explicitely that I have to replace the current command
with "install". It says only I have to make sure that the byte compiled files
are available in the package.

Try to create a new spec file with "rpmdev-newspec -t python foo" and you will
get a foo.spec with exactly that line in %install.

(In reply to comment #5)
> You MUST use python2-devel or python3-devel in BR.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires

Fixed.

(In reply to comment #4)
> Small suggetsion. Don't use any macroses in Url. It is uncomfortably when
> somebody opens such .spec and just want to open a program homepage.

Actually this is useful for me when I reuse spec files for similar packages.
However, fixed.

Spec URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/obapps.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/obapps-0.1.7-3.fc17.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]