https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811330 --- Comment #12 from Patrick C. F. Ernzer <pcfe@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #9) [...] > > after a dictionary lookup, I decided to use 'non-contact' for the next > > release > > The dictionary that rpmlint uses obviously just doesn't know the technical > term. Ah, I meant 'I looked in the dictionary at leo.org and found non-contact better'. Merriam-Webster also agrees that contactless does not exist. I presume 'contactless' is a straight translation of the German 'kontaktlos'. [...] > a) the file isn't really meant to be modified by the user, and as such > shouldn't be marked %config(noreplace); > b) it should be installed in /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/ instead so that it's > clear that it's a system file shipped by a package and not a config file > that can be modified. [...] Agreed and moved in -10 spec file at http://www.pcfe.net/pcsc-cyberjack-3.99.5final.SP03/pcsc-cyberjack.spec and mock build results in http://www.pcfe.net/pcsc-cyberjack-3.99.5final.SP03/pcsc-cyberjack-3.99.5final.SP03-9/fedora-17-x86_64/ and http://www.pcfe.net/pcsc-cyberjack-3.99.5final.SP03/pcsc-cyberjack-3.99.5final.SP03-9/fedora-18-x86_64/ Still unlear to me: pcsc-cyberjack-cjflash has no docs; should I maybe add a README.Fedora to the cjflash sub-package that points to the main package's README? PCFE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review