https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854386 --- Comment #7 from Guillermo Gómez <guillermo.gomez@xxxxxxxxx> --- Ruby: [!]: Specfile should use macros from rubygem-devel package. Note: The specfile doesn't use these macros: %doc %{gem_docdir} %files doc %doc %{gem_instdir}/README.markdown %doc %{gem_dir}/doc << please use rubygem-devel package macros for this. [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached diff). Diff spec file in url and in SRPM --------------------------------- --- /home/gomix/Fedpkg/fedora-review/854386-rubygem-openstack-quantum-client/srpm/rubygem-openstack-quantum-client.spec 2012-10-26 06:16:54.135068777 -0430 +++ /home/gomix/Fedpkg/fedora-review/854386-rubygem-openstack-quantum-client/srpm-unpacked/rubygem-openstack-quantum-client.spec 2012-10-26 06:16:56.549061667 -0430 @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ Name: rubygem-%{gem_name} Version: 0.1.5 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: The main objective of this gem is to deal easily with openstack quantum Heads up, this a false positive BUT, just to make the reviewer life happier, always include both links, srpm and spec (fedora-review has detected the old one in bz). [?]: Empty changelog entry for version 0.1.5-2 ? %changelog * Sun Oct 15 2012 Alejandro Pérez <aeperezt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 0.1.5-2 * Sun Sep 02 2012 Alejandro Pérez <aeperezt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 0.1.5-1 - Initial package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review