https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869301 Bug ID: 869301 QA Contact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Assignee: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Summary: Review Request: erlpmd - A drop-in replacement for epmd written in Erlang Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlpmd.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlpmd-2.0.0-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: A drop-in replacement for epmd written in Erlang. Fedora Account System Username: peter Koji scratchbuild: * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4618688 rpmlint: sulaco ~: rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/erlpmd-2.0.0-1.fc19.src.rpm rpmbuild/RPMS/ppc/erlpmd-2.0.0-1.fc19.ppc.rpm erlpmd.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) epmd -> deep erlpmd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US epmd -> deep erlpmd.ppc: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) epmd -> deep erlpmd.ppc: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US epmd -> deep ^^^ false positives erlpmd.ppc: E: no-binary erlpmd.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib ^^^ That's ok. This is how almost all Erlang packages are designed. Even if they doesn't contain arch-specific data they must (should, actually, but that's a long story) be installed into arch-specific directory. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. sulaco ~: The idea behind this package is to build a better Erlang Port Mapping Daemon (epmd for short) that current one. Right now it's fully compatible with epmd but I plan to add more features - nodes auto-discovery via Avahi, better fault tolerance, status retrieval, syslog/journald logs redirection, and much more. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review