[Bug 208613] Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208613





------- Additional Comments From fitzsim@xxxxxxxxxx  2007-02-14 14:29 EST -------
I think this should happen so that we have faster turnaround time for pure-class
library libgcj bugs.  Jakub, do you think this is reasonable?  As Andrew said,
it doesn't seem reasonable to ask Jakub to do a multi-hour respin of the gcc
rpms for the backport of a single patch from GNU Classpath.

That said, if this is going to happen for Fedora 7 I'm saying right now that
we'll need an extension past the February 20th freeze.  Jesse, is there a
procedure for requesting such an extension?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]