[Bug 864937] Review Request: zeromq3 - Software library for fast, message-based applications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864937

--- Comment #3 from Ralph Bean <rbean@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Issues:
=======

[!]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
     Note: %defattr present but not needed
[!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
     Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required

Since you're not going to be building this for el5, the extra defattr section
under the zeromq3-devel section can be discarded.  The removal of the buildroot
at the beginning of the install section can be removed as well.

If you can take care of the above two issues, I'll approve the package without
further delay.


Comments:
=========

[!]: Package does not generate any conflict.
     Note: Package contains Conflicts: tag(s) needing fix or justification.
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Conflicts

This is expected and not actually a blocker., since the two zeromq*-devel
packages cannot coexist.


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
     Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[!]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
     Note: %defattr present but not needed
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in %package
     devel
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[-]: Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "LGPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 2 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/threebean/864937-zeromq3/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[!]: Package does not generate any conflict.
     Note: Package contains Conflicts: tag(s) needing fix or justification.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: CheckResultdir
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
     --requires).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[-]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
     Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[!]: SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
     Note: Source0 (zeromq-3.2.0.tar.gz)
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: zeromq3-devel-3.2.0-0.2.20121009git1ef63bc.fc18.x86_64.rpm
          zeromq3-debuginfo-3.2.0-0.2.20121009git1ef63bc.fc18.x86_64.rpm
          zeromq3-3.2.0-0.2.20121009git1ef63bc.fc18.src.rpm
          zeromq3-3.2.0-0.2.20121009git1ef63bc.fc18.x86_64.rpm
zeromq3-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
zeromq3.src:10: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
zeromq3.src: W: invalid-url Source0: zeromq-3.2.0.tar.gz
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint zeromq3-debuginfo zeromq3 zeromq3-devel
zeromq3.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libzmq.so.3.0.0
/lib64/libm.so.6
zeromq3-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'



Requires
--------
zeromq3-devel-3.2.0-0.2.20121009git1ef63bc.fc18.x86_64.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC
filtered):

    /usr/bin/pkg-config
    libzmq.so.3()(64bit)
    zeromq3(x86-64) = 3.2.0-0.2.20121009git1ef63bc.fc18

zeromq3-debuginfo-3.2.0-0.2.20121009git1ef63bc.fc18.x86_64.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC
filtered):


zeromq3-3.2.0-0.2.20121009git1ef63bc.fc18.x86_64.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

    /sbin/ldconfig
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
    librt.so.1()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)



Provides
--------
zeromq3-devel-3.2.0-0.2.20121009git1ef63bc.fc18.x86_64.rpm:

    pkgconfig(libzmq) = 3.2.1
    zeromq3-devel = 3.2.0-0.2.20121009git1ef63bc.fc18
    zeromq3-devel(x86-64) = 3.2.0-0.2.20121009git1ef63bc.fc18

zeromq3-debuginfo-3.2.0-0.2.20121009git1ef63bc.fc18.x86_64.rpm:

    zeromq3-debuginfo = 3.2.0-0.2.20121009git1ef63bc.fc18
    zeromq3-debuginfo(x86-64) = 3.2.0-0.2.20121009git1ef63bc.fc18

zeromq3-3.2.0-0.2.20121009git1ef63bc.fc18.x86_64.rpm:

    libzmq.so.3()(64bit)
    zeromq3 = 3.2.0-0.2.20121009git1ef63bc.fc18
    zeromq3(x86-64) = 3.2.0-0.2.20121009git1ef63bc.fc18



MD5-sum check
-------------


Generated by fedora-review 0.3.0 (c78e275) last change: 2012-09-24
Buildroot used: fedora-18-x86_64
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 864937

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]